American Banality Takes a Swipe at Chris Hayes

The occasions during the week when one can spend time in front of the television watching programming devoted to politics and current affairs without slapping oneself numerous times in the forehead in exasperation that so much money and camera time could be wasted on so many microwaved observational leftovers, so many No shit, Sherlock minutes presented as expert or insider commentary, in other words general lameness are few. One of those exceptions and surely a superlative one is Up with Chris Hayes Sunday mornings on MSNBC.

It’s a distinctive program, the closest antecedent perhaps William F. Buckley’s Firing Line, at least in the sense that the actual point is to delve into the complexity of the subjects it undertakes to discuss, moral, intellectual and otherwise, the principal difference being that Hayes’ show is not by design confrontational.  And mercifully this show is not subject to Buckley’s obscure references to antiquity used to bamboozle or mystify sparring partners vulnerable to the tactic. Naturally complexity, in this age of defiant post-factuality, reactionary mythology, cowed journalism, electronic mayhem and juvenilia is fraught territory from the get-go. Yet so far, Hayes and his well above-average panels have continued to grace the airwaves.

One thing rare about Hayes, for television, is his unconcealed intellectual enthusiasm and curiosity. Besides being simply bright he is fresh enough to journalism and certainly to television journalism not to have become fossilized in lazy, skin-deep Washington faux sophistication and jaded mediocrity. The idea here is to follow a subject as far into the thicket of knowledge and accumulated wisdom as desirable for the enlightenment of panelists and viewers alike. And in fact, one will actually learn things watching this show. If one feels steeped or relatively expert in any given subject already, one won’t feel cheated or insulted by the discussion here.

So obviously, this intellectual adventurousness had to run up against the prevailing anti-intellectualism, demagogic zeitgeist and infantilizing of the public square eventually. The occasion was this past Sunday, when, during a timely Memorial Weekend discussion Hayes set fatted heads around the nation to popping their stuffing when he heaved this football out for the panel to toss around:

“I think it’s interesting because I think it is very difficult to talk about the war dead and the fallen without invoking valor, without invoking the words “heroes.” Why do I feel so [uncomfortable] about the word “hero”? I feel comfortable — uncomfortable — about the word because it seems to me that it is so rhetorically proximate to justifications for more war. Um, and, I don’t want to obviously desecrate or disrespect memory of anyone that’s fallen, and obviously there are individual circumstances in which there is genuine, tremendous heroism: hail of gunfire, rescuing fellow soldiers and things like that. But it seems to me that we marshal this word in a way that is problematic. But maybe I’m wrong about that.”

Predictably this was followed by an epidemic outbreak, especially on the right of how dare he? Anyone lulled into believing one could delve into the semantics and nature of heroism or the politics of language that surrounds foreign policy and American military adventure without the reliable town lynch mob hearing about it was abruptly witness to bombs bursting in air. The reaction was reminiscent of the brain dead controversy that greeted Bill Maher when he made the entirely indisputable and plainly obvious point after 9-11 that the men who flew planes into the World Trade Center were not cowards, as they were roundly being called, flying a plane into the side of a building and physical cowardice all but mutually exclusive. There was Orwellian creepiness all over Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer’s response that, “There are reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do.” Then ABC gave Politically Incorrect the ax.

Eager to ensure no one perceive an unsightly sprouting of testicles at a corporate media outfit NBC trotted out some mouthpieces on the NBC payroll (Star Jones, Danny Deutsch and Nancy Synderman) to deplore Hayes as a disgrace to mom and apple pie and to declare that his comments were in no way a reflection on the abiding timorousness of liberal weinerdom. Personally, I would prefer to see an old fashioned rumble across the airwaves with these faux-patriotic, bullet-headed, phony declaimers of  effrontery, but of course I happen to be of the Irish persuasion.

Frankly, this country is about is dumb as it can get already without bumping into walls and dribbling saliva. We’re the country where evolution and climate change are controversial, academe is a dirty word and intellectual pursuit and being a member in good standing of the salt of the earth somehow are incompatible. Bullshit. In any case, the last thing this country needs is to stifle intelligent discourse whenever it can be found, though it is an abiding truth by now that the more uninformed, low information voting Americans there are, the better for our radicalized Republican champions of ascendant medievalism.

DR. BERWICK, A COUPLE OF WORDS ABOUT OUR FRIENDS ON THE RIGHT

Yesterday on his show, Up with Chris Hayes, Mr. Hayes conducted an interview with the recent head of CMS (Centers of Medicare and Medicaid) Dr. Donald Berwick, a pediatrician and Harvard professor who has spent a great deal of time researching and applying ways to make the health care system more efficient. The interview was quickly heralded, and deservedly, in journo, newsy, political junkie circles for being exceptionally enlightening about the health care system generally, and health care efficiency and the new Affordable Care Act more specifically (Indeed, most discussions on this fine show have an uncommon depth and freshness).

A key point made by Dr. Berwick, and one he has frequently made in the past, is that lower costs and higher quality rather than being mutually exclusive actually go together. He and those with whom he has collaborated seized on the idea of adapting proven innovations in efficiency in other economic sectors of the economy, including auto manufacturing, to the health care system. Indeed, many such improvements have been isolated and successfully implemented in various settings.

During yesterday’s program Dr. Berwick elaborated on the notion that improving access while introducing efficiency would promote quality and reduce costs. Berwick sensibly pointed out that lower costs will effectuate expanded utilization of health services, meaning not only a healthier, more productive citizenry, but increased quality due to the influx of additional money into the system from all of those additional health care customers, and an improvement in quality through more efficient health care practices. All in all, this bracingly rational discussion reminded us what is possible when people are genuinely and creatively seeking solutions.

And this raises the question: What does that have to do with life here on the Planet Earth, where we remain afflicted with a pestilent species known as Republicans, creatures biologically driven to ensure that if possible all that is within their political reach during the era of Obama shall be fucked up beyond all recognition? 

Here’s one striking indication Republicans don’t give a rolling donut about improving American health care: they never mention it. Well, not unless someone else mentions it first, either Obama, or any other Kenyan anti-colonialist threatening the ugly specter of systemic reform. Indeed, their failure to lift a finger to address exorbitantly rising costs and growing inaccessibility during the six years Republicans simultaneously controlled congress and the executive branch is reasonably dispositive of their indifference.

And let me add a few observations about the conservative brethren from one unfortunate enough to encounter, and pugnacious enough to engage in no-holds-barred conversations with rank and file conservatives (And I concede, Dr. Berwick has learned first-hand what a sliming by the Republican Media-Political Complex feels like). Dr. Berwick lauds the benefits of expanded access, by which customers are added and costs are lowered. Well, these folks don’t want more customers or lower costs. Indeed, higher costs have the desired effect here as they do at restaurants and resorts: they keep the riff-raff out.

Republicans are horrified by the prospect of this inundation of the system with masses of the putatively unwashed, which  will put them in unwanted proximity to undesirables they currently find themselves nowhere near when they exercise their privileged access to doctors and services. Let’s remember with whom we’re dealing here. In the Republican view, all but synonymous now with Ayn Rand’s pseudo-philosophical feudalism, the world is divided into the well-compensated and worthy producers and the unworthy masses of slugs. Health care is a privilege indeed.  Conservatives like privilege. Conservatives love exclusivity. That’s in great part what the class war from above is all about.  

Sustaining high costs and restricted access sustains health care as a luxury and a status symbol, an easily perceptible marker of who has made it and who has not. As Republicans would say about virtually anything, they would say about health care access: “If you work hard enough and make the correct choices you can have what I have.”  As idiotic, unencumbered by thought and dumbly malicious as their typical responses on any number of issues, they’ll say the same here, too. If they don’t have a problem, then, “What’s the problem?” You just have to become as remarkable as they mistakenly believe themselves to be.

You can argue with them about humaneness, about universal health care as evidence of higher civilization but they’ll only laugh (or grunt). These aren’t concepts that exactly resonate with the right in case anyone has failed to notice. So, as fortunate as we may be to enjoy the expertise and skill and idealism of the Dr. Berwicks of the world, until we don’t have any Republicans, or at least until the infestation is reduced to levels that eliminate their power to influence public policy our Dr. Berwicks can have all the marvelous ideas and innovations they can possibly conjure, and explain them to us exceedingly well: they’re currently DOA on this Republican plagued planet.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 86 other followers

%d bloggers like this: