The Republican Cannibals: People Who Need People

cannibalism 3

It is entirely possible America’s right wing demonstrates its love of America’s ordinary people in some highly unorthodox and undetectable way. Until such time as this currently obscured affection is rendered detectable it is only reasonable to interpret the overt hostility of fashionable right-wing ideology and policy proposals as indicative of a dim regard for ordinary citizens of The United States (They don’t think much of citizens of the rest of the world either but we won’t go there right at the moment).

It is never so stated of course, but in the Ayn Rand and Austrian School and even traditional country club thinking clutched to the Republican Party bosom now and fastened there with duct tape human beings, or the majority of them anyhow exist as fodder: raw economic material, cheap labor, easily malleable and deserving suckers of marketing for products and services and every fetid propaganda, powerless consumers here for the bilking, as well of course as impotent environmental sufferers at the hands of indifferent, entitled polluters: in other words Soylent Green tastily consumed with Grey Poupon.

Be it evident in its hostility to any kind of consumer-friendly, health improving health reform, attacks on the safety net, advocacy for the corporate and financial sectors, war-making on labor unions and collective bargaining, targeting of middle class investments and investments in the nation’s future, animus toward regulation, environmental standards and workplace safety, advancing of tax policies which increase or enshrine economic inequality, ordinary human beings on a good day are an afterthought in the eyes of this benighted worldview, on an average day a distasteful necessity, on a bad day an inexpensive and expendable commodity, and on every day saps.

You’ll hear a lot from the right-wing Republican herd about “the market” or more preposterously “liberty” but the oleaginous ideological rhetoric is smokescreen for or perhaps lipstick on a very gluttonous pig: a fancy cover, in their imagination at least, for feudalistic apologia and pus-filled plutocracy. This philosophical name-dropping and promiscuous blathering of grandiose buzzwords is intended to demonstrate a reverence for capitalism, though in fact what is being promoted is a transmogrification of capitalism as a mutant strumpet Adam smith wouldn’t recognize if it stripped down and took him to bed.

This dominance of capital over labor, ideology over human beings, philosophical systems over morality or common decency or the public good walnuts like Paul Ryan or Ted Cruz or Charles and David Koch swoon over as visions of the Dickensian paradise or Objectivism’s happiest place on earth, the Road to Serfdom for America’s 99%: Atlas no longer shrugging but happily sucking his pacifier.

This cannibalism is evident in every Republican position: with health care the concern isn’t ensuring the largest number of Americans can achieve or sustain health, or afford a basic necessity like doctors’ care when sick or suffering, or prevention of future disease; but rather, preventing or impeding reform so as to perpetuate a desperate class of consumers, profitability for America’s insurance companies and hospital CEO’s. Republicans invariably favor the interests of polluters over ordinary citizens and members of the communities in which they make their profits: Let them eat sulfur dioxide. Likewise, the Republican priority on taxes remains a tax structure guaranteeing the middle class and poor will continue bearing the brunt of Social Security funding, contributing a high percentage of income in payroll and sales and excise taxes so the wealthy, and “job creators” and “producers” pay relatively little in tax on incomes.

It goes on and on of course: opposition to a minimum wage is a given,  for what regard should be paid the dignity and well being of human beings perceived only as stereotypes and woebegone abstractions against the Republican defended interests of big business and ownership? Who cares about the safety of workers if it inconveniences their employers? It isn’t the victims of faulty products that kill or maim who earn the sympathy and protection of this political brand: it is those who make the product and profit. The principal party in the eyes of these jesters for the economic elite will never be the injury-sustaining worker but rather will invariably be the profitable opponent of regulation. Americans, little more to this bunch than ducklings for targeting at the carny shooting booth in the service of profitability for arms manufacturers are saddled with the disadvantage they’re likelier to be a sitting duck than the carnival kind that moves. As I say, on and on.

Silly, grandiose philosophies aside, how individuals can prance like pygmy ponies on behalf of barons and fat cats and large, grotesque toads such as Donald Trump may always remain mysterious. One might ask, as I have with great curiosity how they live with themselves, while the best evidence indicates their ethos depends upon the delusion that one retains ones rectitude by advocating crumbs of private charity to the poor while the policies one conceives and the society one builds consigns them to poverty, deepens their poverty and adds to their numbers.

In the meantime, in their radicalized eyes you’re neither treasured as a human being or valued as a citizen: you’re a Happy Meal.

 

Politics is Life or Death: Why Your Loathing of the GOP is Perhaps Inadequate

Yes, despite every appearance there are rank and file Republicans who are decent, and in some cases fabulous people. Of course, they aren’t currently running for office or holding office as a member of the Republican Party, nor do they work for a right-wing news operation or political blog; nor are they involved with a conservative activist group or pac. Tragically, they may in fact be constituents of or members of the audience for these previously listed representatives of moral and intellectual rot, those in other words among the thousand points of dark, to modify a famous phrase from former president “Poppy” Bush. Consider them however, if not innocent, somewhat understandable victims of the worst among us, assaulted and battered by effectively brutish propaganda.

There are many who say that to construe the current severe dichotomy in our politics as a de-facto civil war is to overstate at best, and to become egregiously hyperbolic at worst. But alternately, in my debatably humble opinion I wonder if it is not possible, given history, to construe a failure to identify what arguably is dangerous and aggressive extremism as appeasement, unforgivable docility, irresponsible complacency and even cowardice? From a progressive point of view how else then should one respond to lying and thorough deception brazen even by the lowliest standards of politics, extremism that is irrational and debilitating to the country (see: downgrading of nation’s credit rating due to debt ceiling hostage crisis, fraying social, physical and educational infrastructure, millions uninsured and unhealthy)? Does it not fall somewhere between unforgivably pusillanimous and criminally idiotic to fail to engage when war has been declared against one?

It most certainly is rational and accurate to construe the policies Republicans are promising as having, if implemented, life or death consequences. The proposal for transformation of Medicaid into block grants going to the states rather than funded as it is currently means the lives of millions of children and elderly literally will be jeopardized. Beyond the loss of access to medical care for poor adults and children, the Romney-Ryan plan severely affects millions of elderly who rely upon it to pay for their nursing home care given that even middle-class seniors quickly burn through their savings after moving into such facilities. What will happen to this multitude of vulnerable seniors once the Medicaid rug is yanked from underneath them? The likely result is tragic to put it mildly.

Several Republican governors already have become pioneers in the practice of such despicable healthcare politics. These would be the dunderheaded ideologues oblivious to the needs of their constituents, Republican governors refusing full funding guaranteed to states for three full years for an expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare that would cover many currently uninsured Americans. Two of these malpracticing governors, Rick Perry of Texas and Rick Scott of Florida preside over states with among the highest numbers of uninsured citizens, Texas first and Florida tenth in the number of uninsured. For the governors it is just blithely brain dead ideological bravado, but yes, these dumbasses might actually kill you.

As reprehensible as anything in the Romney-Ryan plan for Medicaid is a proposed change in the rules that would allow nursing homes to demand the assets of children of their elderly parents before access to Medicaid funds would be approved. Whereas now seniors who pay out nearly all of their accumulated assets to owners of their nursing homes begin to quality for subsidization of their nursing home care by Medicaid, under the proposed Romney-Ryan change would not do so until their children burned through the bulk of their assets too, young and old handing over lifetimes’ worth of hard earned treasure to the nursing home conglomerates. Who says Republicans are deaf, dumb and blind to the needs of Americans? They are sensitive to a fault to the needs of the CEOs of corporate finance, health and energy for exorbitant profits… and these are Americans too, aren’t they?

Already, Republicans’ long opposition to the universal health insurance utilized by every other nation in the industrialized world has resulted in lack of access to basic healthcare for countless millions of our fellow citizens, and the dire, often lethal consequences of such an inexcusable state of affairs, in particular the lack of access to preventive care that has resulted in no small number of preventable deaths (far exceeding the numbers in nations with universal insurance). The Romney-Ryan plan and past Republican proposals to privatize the great, overwhelmingly successful Social Security and Medicare programs that have prevented millions of elderly from sinking into poverty and wretched circumstances jeopardize the health and certainly the actual lives of innumerable elderly citizens, the Romney-Ryan plan to offer vouchers in place of guaranteed coverage under Medicare only the most recent and bloodless.

Of course the important thing from the Republican point of view is that hegemony of the corporate and business sectors over American lives, income, freedom and health be retained at all cost, along with the generous financial backing of Republican power that flows from it, not anything as quaint or quotidian as the basic needs of or basic fairness toward ordinary American citizens and consumers. While the mainstream press has little appetite for presenting the bland abstractions out of the mouths of well, bland abstractions like Paul Ryan as anything other than the ruddy sport of politics, if sport it is, it is a contest to the death for many flesh and blood Americans, most of whom no one beyond their families will ever hear about.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 86 other followers

%d bloggers like this: