Life on Pluto: Debt, Guns & Greed

pluto

It is simply due diligence to assign America the credit it rightly deserves for the mere lip service it pays to reality, rationality, and not incidentally, truth, as it sloshes around attempting, nominally, to govern itself. Indeed, operating at such remove from the tedious bounds of sanity is something to be proud of in a certain way. Yes, you propagandists of American exceptionalism, I concede, the place is pretty damned exceptional.

When it comes to those intolerable challenges of modernity, be they climate change, gun slaughter, health care or economics we do it our way. Steadfastly, we remain so bravely distant from other wealthy democracies in the manner in which we deal with all of our outstanding exigencies one can only admire that we do so with such bold and beautiful crazy insufficiency. Other nations, none of whom have anything remotely close to our level of gun homicides are home to insane people and to violent entertainment, they just don’t have the, uh, guns. Only here is it controversial to draw a direct conclusion from that. Only in America is it walking on the wild side of policy innovation to discuss the regulation of individual access to weapons of warfare for safety reasons. Yes, we live in a nation where proponents of arming everyone as a safety precaution are principals in the national debate, invited to august televised forums to declaim American history as vaudeville, and the mythology of cheap, paperback Westerns as safety policy.

For our Salvador Dali canvases of national discourse, for our relegation of empiricism and the tediousness of lessons derived from the storehouse of accumulated human knowledge to irrelevance, for our globally distinctive comfort living under plutocracy I hereby rename us Pluto.

Alas, the debt creators at last have discovered the root of all evil: debt! While Republican presidents double and triple deficits, throw surpluses out the window with lavish tax giveaways to lavishly rich Americans, all without a peep from those Republican hellhounds of hypocrisy and hari-kari economics in the peanut gallery, a Democratic presidency reduces them to wails and the gnashing of teeth over debt, while every American watching knows the bunch of slimy, sniveling, scenery-chewing dissimulators of humbuggery couldn’t care less about debt.

Only in America’s rarefied climate of problem-solving will an exotic species of anti-Enlightenment ideologues ruling the House of Representatives threatening the demolition of the world economy because of feigned concern for debt, be widely regarded as just another day at the Washington office, while unusual, yet legitimate remedies such as executive invoking of the 14th Amendment or the minting of the trillion dollar platinum coin are deemed TOO unusual. The uptake is that our flailing national debate is manifestly bananas by any rational measure of effective governance.

Admit it, but there is something fondly and warmly Disneyland about America discussing not the methods best for dealing with the ramifications of climate change, but whether there is such a thing as climate change. Indeed, it may be nothing if not quaintly American that our progressive president bequeaths us a budget deal sealing in 84% of the Bush tax cuts, along with sweetheart rates on dividends, and all but the abolition of the estate tax. In fact, one must face the actuality that it may only be one’s own constrained imagination that prevents one from seeing that in penalizing financial institutions peanuts for fraudulently and negligently foreclosing on millions of distressed mortgage-holders, or by perpetuating lucrative subsidizing of an array of high rollers in the fiscal cliff deal the banks and the global corporations are the little guy, and these solutions are touchingly Capraesque.

In any case, one cannot reasonably draw any conclusion other than that this is now a plutocracy beyond remedy, the fix is in, in cement, that the one percent and the financial and corporate sectors OWN the place. And observing the demented bread and circuses that pass for a democratic process now, with negligible if any import or effect whatsoever, one can say that at least they are more than serviceable as diversion for the population. In other words, the Plutonian future is, to paraphrase 28 Days Later, fucking nigh. Where else but America could you spend twice the amount of GDP on health care as every other industrialized democracy with universal health insurance, remain at the bottom of the international barrel in health care outcomes and still be sinking, yet entertain with credulity the pronouncement by an influential segment of the body politic that the nation enjoys “the best health care system in the world”?

Surely, as far as American history goes, this is an era that will live in infamy in the annals of clusterfucks.

So Much of His Own Petard to Hoist Mitt Romney On

If TV killed the radio star, videotape is raping, sodomizing and murdering Willard Romney’s presidential aspirations. For the millions wondering and speculating how the campaign for president by a man who has literally occupied every position on every salient issue of our time would look in practice, we can now say it looks like interns employed by the Obama campaign and media outlets gassed and out of breath from running back and forth from the video storage room for evidence of the latest Romney boomerang that fits the moment.

So tireless at pirouettes he is the envy of professional ballerinas everywhere, Romney seems to proceed with no plan or strategy whatsoever for contending with the very concrete reality that he is on the everlasting record on virtually every form of recording device since papyrus taking firm stands the opposite of the firm stands he took before. On everything: abortion, climate change, the Bush tax cuts, immigration, guns and the NRA, stem cell research, same-sex marriage…I’d go on, but I’m not getting paid by the hour (or at all).

What’s almost preternatural and utterly baffling about Romney is that he never even seemed to consider for a second any nuanced evolution of his positions out of, oh say, dread of shame and embarrassment at such conspicuously egregious backflips all across the board; or inevitable ridicule, or accusations that only an empty plastic container could be so lacking in core beliefs. The fact that he hasn’t seemed to think it matters at all even as he runs for president arouses an almost desperate thirst for psychological explanation, the inscrutability of his morally and intellectually baseless behavior at George Costanza levels. In political terms, Richard Nixon wants his trophy for soulless cynicism and ruthless lying back.

But trying to follow the Romney campaign’s contortions attempting to deal with health care in light of the recent court decision, and more precisely the exact likeness of Romneycare to Obamacare hurts your eyes and your head and your neck. Romney’s senior campaign advisor says this: “He disagreed with the ruling. He disagreed with the findings of the ruling. He disagreed with the logic that supported those findings. He said that he agreed with the dissent, which was written by Justice Scalia, and the dissent clearly stated that the mandate was not a tax.”

So, according to this, Romney disagrees with the finding that Obamacare, in other words Romneycare, his own reform, is constitutional. He agrees with Scalia that Obamacare, in other words Romneycare is unconstitutional because the individual doesn’t pay a tax but a penalty when he or she  fails to purchase health insurance, meaning Obamacare, in other other words Romneycare shouldn’t be allowed to exist at all  in its current form. Uh, yowsers!

And then, Romney spokesperson Amanda Henneberg, ostensibly in Romney’s defense, or attacking Obama on Romney’s behalf, or something, said, : “The Supreme Court left President Obama with two choices: the federal individual mandate in Obamacare is either a constitutional tax or an unconstitutional penalty. Governor Romney thinks it is an unconstitutional penalty. What is President Obama’s position: is his federal mandate unconstitutional or is it a tax?”  Okay, I think I got a bead on this. She is saying Obamacare, in other words  Romneycare in Massachusetts imposes either a constitutional tax or an unconstitutional penalty. Governor Romney thinks his own health reform program imposes an unconstitutional penalty. While some people’s immediate reaction to this would be to declare that the nation’s most pressing issue now is universal health insurance for turkeys given that criticizing the Romney campaign’s untenable position/positions on health reform is going to be a turkey shoot, mine is this little scene from Kubrick’s flick, Full Metal Jacket.

Colonel: Marine, what is that button on your body armor?

Private Joker: A peace symbol, sir!

Colonel: Where’d you get it?

Private Joker: I don’t remember, sir!

Colonel: What is that you’ve got written on your helmet?

Private Joker: “Born to kill,” sir!

Colonel: You write “Born to kill” on your helmet, and you wear a peace button. What’s that supposed to be, some kind of sick joke?

Private Joker: No, sir!

Colonel: What is it supposed to mean?

Private Joker: I don’t know, sir!

Colonel: You don’t know very much, do you?

Private Joker: No, sir!

Colonel: You better get your head and your ass wired together, or I will take a giant shit on you!

Private Joker: Yes, sir!

Colonel: Now answer my question or you’ll be standing tall before the man!

Private Joker: I think I was trying to suggest something about the duality of man, sir!

Colonel: The what?

Private Joker: The duality of man. The Jungian thing, sir!

Colonel: Whose side are you on, son?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 82 other followers

%d bloggers like this: